Many people in Pakistan believe that the police possess unlimited powers and that once an investigation begins, ordinary citizens, accused persons, or even complainants have no practical way to verify whether the investigation was honestly conducted. Unfortunately, this misunderstanding has existed for decades.
However, the law tells a different story.
Under the Police Rules 1934 and the relevant provisions of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984, there are lawful mechanisms through which courts can examine police records and determine whether an investigation was genuine, manipulated, incomplete, or entirely fabricated.
Under Rule 45 of the Police Rules 1934, every police station is legally required to maintain approximately 25 official registers.
These registers serve different administrative and investigative purposes, including:
The entire investigation process is supposed to leave documentary traces within these registers.
This is extremely important because in many criminal trials, oral statements alone are not enough. Documentary evidence often determines whether the prosecution story is believable or doubtful.
An important legal question arises here:
Can any person freely inspect police records?
The answer is no.
Under Rule 27.16 and Chapter 22 Rule 49 of the Police Rules 1934, some police documents are classified as “privileged documents.”
This means:
However, the law also recognizes that certain records may become relevant during a criminal trial.
Rule 49 of Chapter 22 creates an important distinction between:
These are generally protected from public inspection.
These may be produced before a court whenever necessary for justice.
This distinction becomes critically important during criminal litigation because courts possess authority to summon documents relevant to the truth of the case.
The defense in an important criminal case recently invoked Articles 158 and 161 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984.
These provisions empower courts to:
This legal authority allows courts to review police registers whenever contradictions or doubts arise in the investigation.
Such applications are particularly useful where allegations involve:
Register No. 2 is commonly known as the Station Diary or Daily Diary.
It is one of the most important registers maintained in a police station because it records the daily operational history of police activities.
Almost every important event occurring at the police station is supposed to be entered into this diary.
The Station Diary may include:
If police claim that an accused person was arrested at a particular time and place, that information should normally appear in Register No. 2.
This register acts as an independent counter-check against the investigation file.
In many situations, the investigating officer is not personally writing the Station Diary. Usually, another police official or station clerk records these entries.
Because of this, Register No. 2 may expose inconsistencies such as:
A skilled defense lawyer can compare:
If contradictions appear, the credibility of the prosecution case may suffer serious damage.
This principle applies in numerous criminal matters, including:
In all such matters, the Station Diary may help courts determine whether police actions actually occurred as claimed.
Register No. 19 maintains the official record of items deposited in the police store room (Malkhana).
Whenever police claim to recover property or evidence during investigation, those items should normally be entered into this register.
The register may include records relating to:
Suppose police claim that narcotics or weapons were recovered from an accused person.
If those items are missing from the store room register, serious legal questions arise:
Courts often treat such contradictions very seriously because criminal convictions must be based on trustworthy evidence.
A missing or defective store room record can weaken the prosecution case substantially.
Register No. 21 contains the record of Road Certificates.
A Road Certificate documents the transportation or movement of:
This register creates a documentary trail showing who was transported, where they were sent, and for what purpose.
A Road Certificate may record situations such as:
This register helps verify whether official movements actually took place.
For example:
If police claim they transported recovered property to the store room, there should be a corresponding Road Certificate.
If police claim an injured witness was taken for medical examination, transportation details should appear in the register.
Absence of such entries may expose defects or manipulation in investigation.
Many people wrongly assume that only accused persons benefit from exposing investigation defects.
In reality, proper investigation protects everyone.
An innocent person may prove false implication through contradictions in police records.
A genuine victim also benefits because a transparent investigation strengthens the case and prevents acquittal due to technical defects.
These registers help courts determine whether police investigation was fair, lawful, and reliable.
This subject is rarely taught properly despite its enormous practical importance.
Young advocates often focus only on FIRs and witness statements while ignoring documentary contradictions hidden inside police registers.
A capable criminal lawyer should know:
Legal knowledge becomes meaningful only when it is practically applied.
No. Certain police documents are considered privileged under the Police Rules 1934 and cannot ordinarily be inspected without lawful authority.
Yes. Courts may summon relevant records under the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984 if those documents are necessary for deciding the case.
It records the daily activities and events of the police station, including arrests, recoveries, and movement of officials.
It verifies whether recovered property was actually deposited in the police store room.
It records the movement and transportation of persons, property, and official documents through Road Certificates.
Yes. Serious contradictions may damage prosecution credibility and create doubt regarding the investigation.
No. They are equally important for complainants, prosecutors, courts, and investigators seeking transparency and fairness.
The criminal justice system cannot function properly without accountability and documentary verification.
Police registers such as Register No. 2, Register No. 19, and Register No. 21 are not mere technical formalities. They are crucial legal safeguards capable of exposing false investigations, protecting innocent persons, strengthening genuine prosecutions, and ensuring fairness in criminal trials.
Understanding these registers is essential for:
The law becomes powerful only when people understand how to use it correctly.
Thank you very much.
May Allah protect and support you.
Allah Hafiz.
Bridging Pakistani legal expertise with international standards. Serving clients domestically and the Pakistani diaspora worldwide.